A thing I should know myself....

[Robert Goldman]

I have a library that provides `DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED` as a macro for 
defining stub functions.  When you compile a file with unimplemented 
functions, you get a warning of the type `FOO:UNIMPLEMENTED-STUB` in my 
library `FOO`.

I'd like to put in an asdf system definition a file spec something like 
this:

```
(:file "file-with-stubs"
   :method (:around (o c) 
            (handler-bind 
((foo:unimplemented-stub
                               #'(lambda (c)
                                   (print c)
                                   (muffle-warning c))
                 (call-next-method)))
```
but, of course, the package `foo` doesn't exist when this is read 
(although I could put `(asdf:load-system "foo")` upstream of the 
enclosing defsystem).

This isn't a case that's nicely consistent with Faré's hack for 
translating strings or keyword symbols, nor does it seem easy to use 
`find-symbol` for this purpose.

Thoughts?

thanks,
r

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20180614/fd5e64ef/attachment.html>