Warning: Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action
Stas Boukarev
stassats at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 16:58:21 UTC 2017
ASDF keeps inventing good reasons all the time...
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:43 PM Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, is it a case where you're insisting on using a secondary system
> name that doesn't follow the convention B/A when the primary system is
> B ? That might explain it. There is also a warning against such a
> thing, and for good reason.
>
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics•
> http://fare.tunes.org
> Doing well is the result of doing good. That's what capitalism is all
> about.
> — Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > cat b.asd
> > (defsystem A)
> >
> > (defsystem B
> > :depends-on (A))
> >
> > (asdf:load-system 'b) is enough to trigger it.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:51 PM Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> See section 4 of the ASDF 3.3 paper at ILC 2017 for a quick overview:
> >> https://github.com/fare/asdf2017
> >>
> >> To support proper phase separation, ASDF has a new operation,
> >> define-op, that tracks the dependencies of loading a .asd file (i.e.
> >> other systems you operate on, e.g., via load-system or
> >> defsystem-depends-on, etc.)
> >>
> >> I don't know exactly what is your system A and how you use it, but
> >> apparently it's unhappy about depending on the primary system for
> >> define-op yet being earlier in the .asd file, so the other system
> >> hasn't been defined yet.
> >>
> >> Maybe ASDF should refrain from registering a dependency here between
> >> sibling systems. Or not. It was quite subtle to debug about a year
> >> ago, and it fell out of my working cache.
> >>
> >> Is there anything special you do between A and B except a :depends-on ?
> >>
> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics•
> >> http://fare.tunes.org
> >> You think war is economically beneficial? Then why share those benefits
> >> with
> >> dirty foreigners? Let's have a civil war — A war we're sure to win!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > It’s a regular depends-on, but why did it work before without
> problems?
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 18:32 Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > B is primary, but A has to be loaded before it. It precedes B, and
> B
> >> >> > depends
> >> >> > on it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> If it's a regular :depends-on, then B should be able to appear before
> >> >> A, and that should actually work better.
> >> >>
> >> >> If it's a :defsystem-depends-on, it used to be that A must be before
> >> >> B, but the new situation is that they have to be in separate files
> for
> >> >> define-op to work at all.
> >> >>
> >> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics•
> >> >> http://fare.tunes.org
> >> >> For ultimately, the most visible trait of a just man is to have no
> >> >> desire
> >> >> at all to rule others, and only want to rule himself. This decides
> >> >> everything. In other words, the worst people will rule. — Alain
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:23 PM Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Stas Boukarev <
> stassats at gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Looks like this happens because I have two systems in B.asd, A
> and
> >> >> >> > B,
> >> >> >> > and B
> >> >> >> > depends on A.
> >> >> >> Maybe changing the order of the two systems will help.
> >> >> >> Which is primary? Which depends on the other?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics•
> >> >> >> http://fare.tunes.org
> >> >> >> All honest people are welcome to come and live here.
> >> >> >> All dishonest people are welcome to come and die here.
> >> >> >> — Libertarian Open-Borders, Open-Skulls Policy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20171018/71fcc2aa/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list