Warning: Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action
fahree at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 13:05:51 UTC 2017
Can you anonymize it and send it? Or extract a minimal failure case? I
can't reproduce at home, nor imagine what could be happening.
Anton, could you test the syntax-control branch with cl-test-grid, and
grep the results for expansions of the format string "Computing
just-done stamp in plan ~S for action ~S, but dependency ~S wasn't
done yet!" ?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Mathematics is as little a science as grammar is a language. — Ernst Mayr
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, 08:11 Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a work file, can't publish it. But it's just a defsystem with depends-on and components.
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:46 PM Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's hard to tell without seeing the .asd file. The message says that
>> you completed the load-op of the system, but somehow you never did the
>> define-op of the system (the new action that tracks the loading of
>> .asd files so that defsystem-depends-on can be properly staged).
>> Can you tell us more about the "non-complicated" features that you
>> use? Do you follow the "best practices" document?
>> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>> Don't forget your daily prayer to Baah-kup,
>> the God of data storage and recovery!
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > More new warnings from ASDF 3.3, this time I have no idea what it means.
>> > WARNING:
>> > Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action
>> > (ASDF/LISP-ACTION:LOAD-OP
>> > "system"), but
>> > dependency (ASDF/FIND-SYSTEM:DEFINE-OP
>> > "system") wasn't done yet!
>> > The .asd file is not public, but it looks perfectly normal without using any
>> > complicated features.
More information about the asdf-devel