ASDF release candidates

[Faré]

Oh, you mean you had this bug before 3.3 already? That's a useful data
point!

My mental model is indeed that if something depends explicitly on UIOP (or
ASDF?), then something about the "always load ASDF first" mechanism may
cause some bad behavior. But I haven't figured out what.

-#f



On Mar 30, 2017 03:19, "Attila Lendvai" <attila at lendvai.name> wrote:

> > I still haven't inspected the spurious rebuilds of uiop that happened
> > in some contexts.
>
> FWIW, i also see those rebuilds every now and then if i have explicit
> dependency on :uiop or :asdf (which i've gotten rid of, so i don't see
> this anymore).
>
> --
> • attila lendvai
> • PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
> --
> “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds
> discuss people.”
>         — Socrates (c. 470–399 BC, tried and executed)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20170330/f6d9c714/attachment-0001.html>