Another follow-up from yesterday's doc reviews
Robert P. Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.net
Thu Sep 22 20:48:41 UTC 2016
As I said, this is where the DWIM slipped in....
I never minded keeping track of packages, and in retrospect I claim that getting the package right imposes less complexity than trying to keep track of all the stuff ASDF does behind your back to keep you from having to type "ASDF:"
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 22, 2016, at 15:23, Eric Timmons <etimmons at mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Eric Timmons <etimmons at mit.edu> wrote:
>> As I understand it, the issue isn't really with the DEFSYSTEM form
>> itself. Instead, the issue is with all the *other* code that could be
>> in the .asd file as the manual states that symbols from CL, ASDF, and
>> UIOP will all be available inside an .asd file without an IN-PACKAGE
> Oh, and also about making sure DEFSYSTEM itself doesn't need to be
> prefixed with a package.
More information about the asdf-devel