Test results

Elias Pipping pipping.elias at icloud.com
Mon Sep 12 23:13:18 UTC 2016

> On 12 Sep 2016, at 23:33, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
> I ran the tests again on all three platforms.
> Linux:

I’ve run tests on Linux again, now, too.

> Unexpected test success on ecl-bytecodes (ECL 16.1.2) in this block:
> ;; forced, it should be later
> (DBG "Check that force reloading loads again")
> (setf test-package::*file3* :reset)
> (load-system 'test-asdf/force :force :all)
> (assert-compare (>= (get-file-stamp file1) file1-date))
> (assert-equal test-package::*file3* t)
> I do *not* see this on ECL non-bytecodes.  The tests here fail as before.

I’ve hit the following regressions, some of which overlap with what you see:

- ECL 16.1.2 and newer fail test3.script in regular mode
- ECL 16.1.2 and newer fail test-force.script in ecl_bytescodes mode(+)
- SBCL 1.1.13 now fails plenty of tests (11 to be precise). SBCL 1.3.9 and later are fine(++)
- MKCL-git(*) now fails test-make-build.script and test-program.script(**)

(+) I don’t typically run such tests. It seems I should.
(++) I did not test anything between 1.1.13 and 1.3.9
(*) needs to be very recent
(**) that’s what https://github.com/jcbeaudoin/MKCL/issues/9 is about


More information about the asdf-devel mailing list