fahree at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 15:44:24 UTC 2016
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
> In a recent ticket, Faré writes:
> "Some things are defined in uiop/pathname and used in uiop/filesystem,
> so exporting them is the right thing. There is currently no notion of
> "shared within uiop but not exported outside uiop". I suppose you could
> make do using package::qualifiers and/or import statements. Meh."
> Looking at the UIOP code, I see that there is no equivalent of
> Should we add this? I have the feeling that might be "Should we add
> this, before it's too late?"
Well, there is uiop/driver, but it simply reexports everything.
I couldn't do just that with asdf/interface, for compatibility reason.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
When it comes to giving, some men stop at nothing. — Saul Gorn
More information about the asdf-devel