Version 3.1.7.35 has been pushed

Robert P. Goldman rpgoldman at sift.net
Thu Nov 17 12:53:44 UTC 2016


I think we wait for iolib, but probably not ASDF system connections. Its github site shows no commits for four years, so that might be a long wait....

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 23:49, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I sent these pull requests to fix the issues:
> https://github.com/gwkkwg/asdf-system-connections/pull/2
> https://github.com/sionescu/iolib/pull/41
> 
> Grepping Quicklisp, it appears that two more projects needed fixes,
> but it's actually an example in cl-graph
> (of extracting a graph of ASDF dependencies, which was broken,
> and which I fixed, leveraging POIU's graph representation),
> and a trivial fix for asdf-dependency-grovel,
> which I could push since I'm maintainer.
> 
> https://github.com/gwkkwg/cl-graph/pull/11
> https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/xcvb/asdf-dependency-grovel/commit/07e3ff57a55cccc623b320da93c93ab63280fc54
> 
> I hope that's all. I would refrain from releasing an ASDF with this restriction
> until both asdf-system-connections and iolib have been fixed.
> 
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> The difference between a programmer and a user, is that the programmer
> knows there is no difference between using and programming.     — Faré
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/16/16 Nov 16 -10:31 AM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
>>> another data point:
>>> 
>>> it was caused by asdf-system-connections. i thought i got rid of that
>>> long ago, but it's included in ql, and it got installed on my system
>>> somehow.
>>> 
>>> after
>>> 
>>> (ql:uninstall :asdf-system-connections)
>>> 
>>> my script continues, but then fails later on with iolib's
>>> IOLIB/GROVEL::PROCESS-OP.
>>> 
>> 
>> Thanks, filed https://github.com/sionescu/iolib/issues/40
>> 
>> Best,
>> r
>> 
>> 




More information about the asdf-devel mailing list