*LOAD-TRUENAME* and ASDF
Jason Miller
jason at milr.com
Thu Aug 25 23:55:27 UTC 2016
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the following macro should work:
(defmacro lisp-file-truename ()
(or *compile-file-truename* *load-truename*))
Since minimal compilation requires that macros be expanded at
compile-time, compiling a file with an invocation of the above macro
should expand it.
-Jason
On 15:02 Thu 25 Aug , Robert Goldman wrote:
> On 8/25/16 Aug 25 -1:08 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> > On 8/24/16 Aug 24 -4:50 PM, Faré wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
> >>> I just realized that ASDF somewhat breaks *LOAD-TRUENAME*.
> >>>
> >>> I had some code in a DSL that has an :INCLUDE construct, and that DSL is
> >>> being interpreted at load-time.
> >>>
> >>> The :INCLUDE directive tries to find other lisp files relative to the
> >>> current file (the source file that contained the DSL :INCLUDE expression).
> >>>
> >>> Now, if we were not using ASDF, I would be able to find those files by
> >>> merging a name with *load-truename* (and this is how things used to work).
> >>>
> >>> But ASDF's relocation of the fasls breaks this.
> >
> > [...snip...]
> >
> >> Can UIOP:CURRENT-LISP-FILE-PATHNAME help you?
> >
> > No, I'm afraid not. It returns the same thing that *LOAD-TRUENAME*
> > does: the pathname for the fasl file, located in the cache, instead of
> > the source file.
> >
> > CURRENT-LISP-FILE-PATHNAME evaluates to
> >
> > (or *compile-file-pathname* *load-pathname*)
> >
> > which means that I still get the pathname of the relocated fasl file,
> > instead of the pathname of the lisp source file.
> >
> > I don't obviously see a way to invert the file translation function, either.
> >
> > I'm surprised I never noticed this in all these years.
> >
> > It's not obvious how to fix this, since the idea of having a dynamic
> > variable bound (which was my first thought) isn't clearly feasible,
> > since the COMPILE-FILE and LOAD aren't in a shared function call scope,
> > because of the plan structure.
> >
> > I suppose one could add something to the PERFORM method for LOAD-OP, but
> > when you're performing a LOAD-OP, you aren't even guaranteed that a
> > corresponding COMPILE-OP exists (i.e., the process of COMPILE-THEN-LOAD
> > could have been overridden).
>
> Ok, I *believe* that we could change this:
>
> (defun perform-lisp-load-fasl (o c)
> (if-let (fasl (first (input-files o c)))
> (load* fasl)))
>
> into something like
>
> (defun perform-lisp-load-fasl (o c)
> (if-let (fasl (first (input-files o c)))
> (let ((*lisp-source-truename* (component-pathnme c))
> (load* fasl)))
>
> and then export *lisp-source-truename*.
>
> Not ideal, but I'm having trouble thinking of a good alternative.
>
> The only other thing I can think of would be to supply a function that
> would do:
>
> (uiop:inverted-file-redirection *load-truename*)
>
>
>
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list