Robert P. Goldman rpgoldman at
Mon Aug 1 02:10:40 UTC 2016

On 7/31/16 Jul 31 -9:06 PM, Faré wrote:
>> The closest I'd be willing to go is to remove UIOP:*FATAL-CONDITIONS*
>> > and replace it with a type definition for UIOP:FATAL-CONDITION.  But
>> > even that makes me feel bad.  I guess we can keep this for now, but I'll
>> > be a lot happier when it's simply an alias for CL:SERIOUS-CONDITION.
>> >
> I believe I added UIOP:*FATAL-CONDITIONS* so that users could
> customize the use of WITH-FATAL-CONDITION-HANDLER. I believe it's
> useful.
> But please remove *fatal-condition-exceptions*.

I have kept WITH-FATAL-CONDITION-HANDLER, but removed

I simplified W-F-C-H to be simply a handler for UIOP:FATAL-CONDITION,
since we don't need to have a list-valued UIOP:*FATAL-CONDITIONS* -- we
can simply define UIOP:FATAL-CONDITION with OR.

I'm running the tests now, and will then commit a proposed new version.
I'll send out an email when it's done, and you can review it and let me
know what you think, ok?

I think it's best for you to have a clear proposal to review, instead of
just a description thereof.  I look forward to hearing what you think.


More information about the asdf-devel mailing list