3.1.6

[Faré]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
> On 9/22/15 Sep 22 -2:18 PM, Faré wrote:
>>>> : Faré
>>>> I think the code is ready for 3.1.6.
>>>>
>>>> I see one regression: logical pathnames on CLISP, that don't play well
>>>> with the newly used temporary file strategy. I propose we punt on that
>>>> test and file a bug against CLISP. Maybe some day CLISP will have new
>>>> maintainers who'll fix it. Anyone who uses logical pathnames DESERVES
>>>> to lose.
>>>>
>>
>>> :Robert
>>> That sounds great.  Would you mind filing a launchpad bug for this, if
>>> there isn't one already, and we can make that the first for 3.1.7....
>>>
>>> There'll be no action on my end tomorrow or the next day because of the
>>> holiday and a delivery deadline the following day.  I'll try to get to
>>> releasing after that.
>>>
>>
>> I filed these:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1498629
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/clisp/bugs/677/
>>
>> I will mark the test as a known failure on clisp, if you want. I don't
>> think it should block the release.
>
> That sounds right. Is there an easy way to find all the tests we
> disable?  Is that something you added with this notion of known failure?
>
Not really. Right now, you'd have to
egrep '#[-+]|with-expected-failure' test/**/*.*

Too many #[-+] (a few legitimate ones), not enough with-expected-failure.

I was lazy and the test was utterly failing, so I just used #+

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Wealth, like happiness, is never attained when sought after directly. It comes
as a by-product of providing a useful service. — Henry Ford