Towards release 3.1.6

[Anton Vodonosov]

Currently these lisps are finished:

abcl-1.3.2-fasl42-linux-x86
ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86
ccl-1.11-rc1-r16536-f96-linux-x86
ccl-1.8-r15286m-f95-linux-x86
ccl-1.9-r15756-f96-linux-x86
clisp-2.49-unix-x86
cmu-snapshot-2014-05-dirty__20e_unicode_-linux-x86
cmu-snapshot-2014-12___20f_unicode_-linux-x86
ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode
ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c
ecl-16.0.0-98fc12d3-linux-i686-bytecode
ecl-16.0.0-98fc12d3-linux-i686-lisp-to-c
sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86
sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86
sbcl-1.2.6-linux-x86

The status remains the same - no failures which could be attributed to new ASDF.

Some other versions of these lisp implementations will be tested too. I will followup.


For the record, reports are here:

Full diff https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-49.html

As you see, there are many "improvements" on old lisps just because
many systems use new ASDF features not provided by the ASDF version
shipped with those old lisp impls.

For convenience, here is the diff report including only the tests
which fail on new ASDF:
https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-50.html

Best regards,
- Anton

11.10.2015, 16:31, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
> Got results for
>
> ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86
> clisp-2.49-unix-x86
> cmu-snapshot-2014-12___20f_unicode_-linux-x86
> sbcl-1.2.6-linux-x86
>
> So far looks good - no failures which could be attributed to new ASDF.
>
> Waiting for other lisps to finish.
>
> 10.10.2015, 18:26, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>  On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>   If you are interested, this version of ASDF fails on SBCL 1.0.58:
>>>
>>>   ; caught ERROR:
>>>   ; READ error during COMPILE-FILE:
>>>   ;
>>>   ; Symbol "PRINT-BACKTRACE" not found in the SB-DEBUG package.
>>>   ;
>>>   ; Line: 4307, Column: 29, File-Position: 210191
>>>   ;
>>>   ; Stream: #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM
>>>   ; for "file /home/testgrid/quicklisp-asdf3/asdf.lisp" {ADDDA29}>
>>
>>  Apparently, the first release that include PRINT-BACKTRACE is 1.1.5
>>  from February 2013.
>>
>>  I'll let Robert decide whether it's OK to drop support for SBCL
>>  releases older than that.
>>
>>  I'd weakly vote "yes, it's OK to stop supporting things more than 2
>>  years old", but that's just me.
>>
>>  —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>>  A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice
>>  made for him by circumstance. — Hunter S Thompson