Towards release 3.1.6
Anton Vodonosov
avodonosov at yandex.ru
Sat Oct 10 10:15:51 UTC 2015
Ok, will do (sorry, read this message only today)
10.10.2015, 10:13, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
> All tests pass for ASDF 3.1.5.20 on Linux x64 for:
> ccl clisp sbcl ecl ecl_bytecodes cmucl allegro lispworks mkcl abcl allegromodern
>
> Anton, can you run cl-test-grid against it?
>
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
> — Groucho Marx
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
>> With the sbcl/windows regression on uiop:run-program fixed (1),
>> and the lib-op and monolithic-lib-op features reasonably implemented
>> on all implementations beyond ECL & co (though requiring a CFFI patch),
>> I believe we're all set for ASDF 3.1.6.
>>
>> Anton, do you have time to make a test run of cl-test-grid?
>>
>> If some of you believe the C linking features should (or shouldn't) be included
>> in this release (or the next one), now is the time to voice your opinion.
>> It's 300 to 400 more lines of code — or 800 if we splurge and merge in
>> most of lisp-invocation as we go instead of special-casing it.
>>
>> (1) A real fix requires fixing SBCL.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1501373
>>
>> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>> When you've seen one nuclear war, you've seen them all.
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list