Towards release 3.1.6

Anton Vodonosov avodonosov at yandex.ru
Sat Oct 10 10:15:51 UTC 2015


Ok, will do (sorry, read this message only today)

10.10.2015, 10:13, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
> All tests pass for ASDF 3.1.5.20 on Linux x64 for:
> ccl clisp sbcl ecl ecl_bytecodes cmucl allegro lispworks mkcl abcl allegromodern
>
> Anton, can you run cl-test-grid against it?
>
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
>         — Groucho Marx
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  With the sbcl/windows regression on uiop:run-program fixed (1),
>>  and the lib-op and monolithic-lib-op features reasonably implemented
>>  on all implementations beyond ECL & co (though requiring a CFFI patch),
>>  I believe we're all set for ASDF 3.1.6.
>>
>>  Anton, do you have time to make a test run of cl-test-grid?
>>
>>  If some of you believe the C linking features should (or shouldn't) be included
>>  in this release (or the next one), now is the time to voice your opinion.
>>  It's 300 to 400 more lines of code — or 800 if we splurge and merge in
>>  most of lisp-invocation as we go instead of special-casing it.
>>
>>  (1) A real fix requires fixing SBCL.
>>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1501373
>>
>>  —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>>  When you've seen one nuclear war, you've seen them all.



More information about the asdf-devel mailing list