[asdf-devel] Alternate default lisp system location

Robert P. Goldman rpgoldman at sift.info
Thu Mar 13 17:27:38 UTC 2014

Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> Issuing a warning that OPERATION is being directly subclassed is not
> backwards-compatibility.

For the record, that is NOT the solution that has been pushed.

Instead, after a lot of discussion from Faré, Anton, and others, we
developed a solution that preserved the function of old OPERATION

The solution in the current version *is* backwards-compatibility, and is
not limited to issuing a warning.



More information about the asdf-devel mailing list