[asdf-devel] The issue at hand

Anton Vodonosov avodonosov at yandex.ru
Wed Feb 12 04:56:21 UTC 2014

10.02.2014, 02:31, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
> 27.01.2014, 11:04, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>  Anton: can you run cl-test-grid against that?
>>  If you have time, also try with (uiop:enable-deferred-warnings-check)
>>  and also try with :uiop in the :use list of :asdf-user.
> I have results for ASDF for these lisps:
>  abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86
>  ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86
>  clisp-2.49-unix-x86
>  cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86
>  ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode
>  ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c
>  sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86
> No regressions found so far.
> The report:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-28.html
> It compares the ASDF results to the results with
> original ASDF versions coming with these lisps, on quicklisp 2013-12-13.
> All the failures we see here were discussed previously, they are not ASDF
> problems (quicklisp bug + the strange CCL:SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS on CCL
> when building cl-l10n).
> I am running more tests, will follow up here when results are ready.

I also tested on the same quicklisp version our previous baseline - asdf.2.32.35,
for the following lisps:


The same result - no regressions detected.

Next I will try the deferred-warnings
enabled and :uiop in the use-list of :asdf-user.

More information about the asdf-devel mailing list