[asdf-devel] New release candidate?

Robert Goldman rpgoldman at sift.net
Fri Feb 21 14:30:49 UTC 2014

Faré wrote:
>> I have just compiled report for
>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-35.html
>> Looks good, no regressions.
>> The two CCL failures are due to the previously discussed
>> BTW, I have submitted a ticket for this: http://trac.clozure.com/ccl/ticket/1157
> Thanks!
>> What we do now?
>> Retest on Or run ":use :uiop" and differed warnings tests
>> on
> What about run with :use :uiop first, and see what gives?
> If that changes is to go in, it better be before 3.1 release.

That sounds good.  I don't think we can turn on deferred warnings this time around, because that requires significant new testing.  In particular, this may cause issues with ACL, which has not been extensively tested yet (at least not judging from the cl-test-grid logs I've seen so far).


More information about the asdf-devel mailing list