[asdf-devel] ASDF 3?

[Stas Boukarev]

Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:

> Many people have suggested making the ASDF 2.27 release an ASDF 3.0
> release instead.
>
> I was previously hesitant, wanting to signal that I preserve
> compatibility, and not making it a release that doesn't preserve
> version-satisfies, since the major number is different. But I realize
> that (a) my code may be the only one that ever checks the version of
> ASDF, and I'm having to update it anyway, and (b) considering at the
> list of new features and the major rewrite of previous features, it's
> actually a bigger change in the making than there was from ASDF 1 to
> ASDF 2.
>
> Therefore I'm changing my mind and I am considering calling the next
> release ASDF 3, with feature :asdf3 instead of :asdf2.27.
>
> If you have objections, speak in the next few days.
What if asdf-2.27 is treated as a release-candidate for asdf3? Because
there are many changes, and nobody tests git versions. Make the feature
:asdf3, but the version 2.27.

-- 
With best regards, Stas.