[asdf-devel] More test results

[Faré]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:
> ccl now passes.
>
> clisp fails to build ASDF successfully:
>
clisp now passes. I've had a lot more package woes with it
than with any other implementation, and
I can't find a perfect way to upgrade with it.
2.26.103 passes the normal tests on CLISP,
but only a fraction of upgrade tests.
Insight or solutions appreciated.

> still 9 tests failing on Allegro 8.2:
> asdf-pathname-test.script test-force.script test-module-depend.script
> test-module-excessive-depend.script test-static-and-serial.script
> test-touch-system-1.script test-touch-system-2.script test1.script
> test3.script
>
Only the first one poses problems to me, with a failure in realpath
when deliberately trying to run resolve-symlinks on path that does
not exist. I wonder how that test was working before, or why it broke.
Adding an ignore-errors with a fallback value looks like it works. Meh.

> didn't bother with allegromodern yet...
>
> SBCL passes
>
> ECL goes ape-execrement, and goes into what looks like an infinite loop
> in error-handling on test test-retry-loading-component-1.script.
> Seemingly infinite flood of the following:
>
I've fixed ECL, except for a weird problem while creating an executable.
I'll have to ask help from the ECL guys on test-program.script.

> ABCL compilation failed for me:
>
I'll test again with ABCL.

Thanks a lot for the testing!

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
La superstition porte malheur. — Paul Carvel