[asdf-devel] fare-utils build failure

[Zach Beane]

Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
>> Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Sure. Which format do you prefer?
>>> If I remember correctly, you will want a directory asdf-driver-2.26.100/
>>> containing the code.
>>
>> Either format is fine. Sometimes a tarball implies a level of release
>> engineering.
>>
> That begs the question: how should asdf be distributed?

Does it? I thought we were talking about asdf-driver.

> As asdf.lisp only?

Yes. As it always has been.

Zach