[asdf-devel] testing asdf 2.28 [was: can't run quicklisp with asdf 2.28 on CCL (upgrage issue?)] [was: sbcl results for quicklisp + asdf 2.28]
fahree at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 01:00:57 UTC 2013
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
> Diff between unpatched quicklisp 2013-01-28 and quicklisp 2013-01-28 + asdf 2.28.6 for SBCL and CCL:
> 07.02.2013, 07:16, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>> Meantime the SBCL results for ASDF 2.28.4
>>> Diff comparing to 2.28:
>>> (don't pay attention to weblocks-test, it crushes sometimes when SBCL runs out of heap)
>> OK, so that's (small) progress.
> Note that unicly system started to fail.
It's an ASCII vs UTF-8 issue.
I'm tempted for the 3.0 release to make it use UTF-8 by default
instead of :default, on platforms that support it.
Which means I once again have to track down the handful of offenders.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Our love was a supernova, bursting with an immense light only to wane quickly,
leaving behind a black hole.
More information about the asdf-devel