[asdf-devel] maybe hot-upgrade of ASDF is not needed anymore
rpgoldman at sift.info
Thu Feb 7 21:43:57 UTC 2013
On 2/7/13 Feb 7 -3:36 PM, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
> 08.02.2013, 01:34, "Robert Goldman" <rpgoldman at sift.info>:
>> I'm still not following you. If I have a stale copy of ASDF that came
>> with my implementation, and I load it,
> No, you do not load stale version.
Is this always achievable?
I don't know enough about the range of implementations to know if it's
always possible to avoid loading a stale ASDF.
Is there any case where the implementation uses ASDF enough that one
must load ASDF in order to get the implementation into a position where
it can load Quicklisp?
More information about the asdf-devel