fahree at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 15:17:55 UTC 2012
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
> Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Christophe Rhodes <csr21 at cantab.net> wrote:
>>> Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> writes:
>>>> Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> OK, this is now committed as of ASDF 2.26.21 and POIU 1.29.3.
>>>>> It's slightly smaller, it's much cleaner, and it all works.
>>>>> I hope I have not broken users — please test.
>>>>> Casualties of the cleanup were :feature and :if-component-dep-fails.
>>>>> They were just horrible things.
>>>> FYI, the sb-rotate-byte contrib in SBCL uses :if-component-dep-fails.
>>> What is the correct way now to indicate that a file is part of a system,
>>> but should only be compiled if a given feature is present?
>> It appears that the SBCL contrib SB-ROTATE-BYTE uses :IF-COMPONENT-DEP-FAILS.
>> In the spirit of not breaking everyone's existing SBCL installation,
>> I have implemented *limited* compatibility with :IF-COMPONENT-DEP-FAILS
>> in ASDF 2.26.27, sufficient to cover the usage observed in the wild.
> I'm trying to build my software with 2.26.28, and I get this:
> ASDF could not load sb-cover because
> error opening #P"/usr/local/lib/sbcl/sb-md5/md5-ASDF-TMP.fasl":
> Permission denied.
> What should I do?
It works for me. I suspect you might not have compiled sb-md5 from clean,
and due to that bug I fixed in 2.26.9 which required a substantial refactoring,
ASDF can now see that file was not up-to-date, when it couldn't see it earlier.
Can you recompile this contrib from clean, either in place (by getting
proper access rights)
or in another directly from which you reinstall afterwards?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Nostalgia isn’t what it used to be.
More information about the asdf-devel