[asdf-devel] Suggested patches for ASDF

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Fri Sep 9 19:50:51 UTC 2011

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:

> I think it is safe (shouldn't interfere with any other implementations
> use of ASDF), but this use of *FEATURES* at *run-time* instead of the
> conventional use at compile-time makes me feel a little uncomfortable.
> It feels to me like an abuse of a facility.

Right now this is how my two compilers expose their presence to their users.
I do not see how this could be an abuse and why further variables are
needed. Besides, this is ECL's design, not ASDF's.


Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20110909/9df1fa91/attachment.html>

More information about the asdf-devel mailing list