[asdf-devel] OS X test results on latest ASDF
Robert Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.info
Sun Oct 23 18:47:51 UTC 2011
On 10/22/11 Oct 22 -2:09 PM, Faré wrote:
>> The only possible betterness is that it parses out the blocks that say
>> what the results are, so that you don't have to read through the full
>> clutter (which is available in a /tmp file). You saw what the script
>> drops to standard output.
> The current `make test-all` stops at the first failing Lisp implementation.
> Not great, but at least makes failure obvious.
>
>> Question: would it be reasonable to change the makefile to something like
>>
>> lisps ?= ${ASDF-TEST-LISPS}
>>
>> (I may well have the syntax wrong here)
>>
>> so that people can do
>>
>> export ASDF-TEST-LISPS "ccl clisp sbcl ecl cmucl abcl allegro allegromodern"
>>
>> in their shell configuration?
>>
> Wish granted.
Hm. This seems to behave differently from simple run-tests. E.g.,
run-tests works fine for me, finding CCL from environment variables, but
'make-test-all-lisps` fails, being unable to find ccl...
The problem is in test-upgrade, invoked by test-all-lisps.
run-tests.sh ccl does:
command="${CCL:-ccl}"
but test-upgrades does:
use_ccl () { li="ccl --quiet --load test/script-support" ; ev="--eval" ;
} ; \
Also, I find that for some lisps test-upgrades mistakenly loads my lisp
init, causing spurious fails in some cases.
Makefile patch attached.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Improvements-to-Makefile.patch
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20111023/de585e36/attachment.ksh>
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list