[asdf-devel] Merge or not with upstream ECL's asdf?

[Faré]

> sorry for the lack of response in the last days -- little time to code left
> and even less for reading mailing lists.
>
Ningún problema.

>> I see that your current ECL replaces si:: by ext:
>> on a few symbols in its version of ASDF.
>> Should I merge that into the official ASDF,
>> or should I wait until you make a release of ECL?
>
> It would be nice to have them merged now, for I will forget to do that
> afterwards.
>
OK. Will do.

> I also wanted to ask: is there any kind of automated testing of ASDF already
> set up? I am trying to fix ECL's compiler farm to do other tasks and do the
> ones it does in a bit cleaner way and thought maybe testing ASDF with some
> of the free compilers would be nice -- not a promise, but just a wish right
> now :)
>
cd .../asdf
make do-test lisp=ecl
make do-test lisp=ecl-bytecodes
make do-test-all lisps='ecl ecl-bytecodes'

Actually, I think I'll soon rename do-test to test-lisp
and do-test-all to test-lisps.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org