[asdf-devel] pathname case issue ...
xach at xach.com
Wed Jun 15 18:09:48 UTC 2011
Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
> Upgrading from ASDF1 is one thing.
> Another thing is that on some implementations (notably SBCL), you
> can't undo a defgeneric
What does that mean?
> and if the signature changed, you have to use a new symbol, which
> invalidates ASDF extensions, that have to be reloaded.
How does that relate to asdf:*system-definition-search-functions*?
More information about the asdf-devel