[asdf-devel] SBCL 1.0.49 / ASDF 2.015.3 doesn't load my asdf systems anymore
pc at p-cos.net
Sat Jun 11 16:41:11 UTC 2011
On 11 Jun 2011, at 15:56, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> On 11 June 2011 03:50, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ASDF doesn't introduce logical pathnames, and when you provide them,
>> it makes sure to pass them through to the implementation.
> Behaviour of logical pathnames with DIRECTORY is somewhat underspecified.
> (setf (logical-pathname-translations "foo")
> `(("**;*.fasl.*" "/home/foo/faslcache/**/*.fasl")
> ("**;*.*.*" "/home/foo/**/*.*")))
> and existence both
> (directory "foo:bar;x.fasl")
> return both, or just the one in faslcache?
Just the one in faslcache. If I ask for that particular file directly (foo:bar;quux.fasl), it will only find the first one and cannot find the second one, so directory returning the second one is misleading.
The views expressed in this email are my own, and not those of my employer.
More information about the asdf-devel