[asdf-devel] SBCL 1.0.49 / ASDF 2.015.3 doesn't load my asdf systems anymore
nikodemus at random-state.net
Sat Jun 11 13:56:11 UTC 2011
On 11 June 2011 03:50, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> ASDF doesn't introduce logical pathnames, and when you provide them,
> it makes sure to pass them through to the implementation.
Behaviour of logical pathnames with DIRECTORY is somewhat underspecified.
(setf (logical-pathname-translations "foo")
and existence both
return both, or just the one in faslcache?
SBCL opts for both (modulo the aforementioned bug), other
implementations may do things differently.
Calling TRANSLATE-LOGICAL-PATHNAME first makes the answer unambiguous
-- just the faslcache one, thanks -- which is why I believe ASDF
should do that prior to calling DIRECTORY.
More information about the asdf-devel