[asdf-devel] New ASDF maintainer sought

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 22 19:44:16 UTC 2010


On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon <
pjb at informatimago.com> wrote:

> > No. Why? I mean, the separate components are bundled into a single
> > asdf.lisp and this process is automated (make -f GNUmakefile
> > asdf.lisp). There is no new testing burden. I am just advocating for
> > some common sense in the ASDF codebase, organizing it in a readable
> > and separated way.
>
> This is an alternative, indeed.
>
> asdf.lisp: $(ASDF_SOURCES)
>        clar asdf.lisp $(ASDF_SOURCES)
>

Indeed, eventually one should move my GNUmakefile line from using sed to
using some Lisp implementation for repackaging asdf.lisp, ensuring a version
number, etc.

Incidentally, I am still amazed at how people here find a 4k source file
manageable at all. No organization, functions spread throught the file, no
clear navigation structure... If I have a directory with 10 small files,
each one devoted to a separate and clear task, I know where I have to go to
edit things for that particular topic.

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20100922/6fb2bca5/attachment.html>


More information about the asdf-devel mailing list