fahree at gmail.com
Tue Oct 12 06:38:59 UTC 2010
On 11 October 2010 12:12, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
> The problem is not "stale" fasls in the normal sense of a fasl format
> change. The problem is that the package structure of ASDF changed from
> minor version to minor version, so fasls that reference one minor
> version's packages might contain invalid package references if you
> upgrade to a new minor version.
Maybe ASDF should be made to have a (:nicknames "ASDF-UTILITIES")
for the purpose of compatibility with such files while we obsolete that name?
> If you attempt a recompile on any error, rather than just the invalid
> fasl error, you might be able to automatically get around this problem.
That's another solution.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
"Ask not what the government can do for you. Ask what the government is doing
to you." — David Friedman, "The Machinery of Freedom", p. 21
More information about the asdf-devel