xach at xach.com
Mon Oct 11 16:12:31 UTC 2010
Lou Vanek <lou.vanek at gmail.com> writes:
> FASL compatibility isn't required by me -- I just assumed that since I
> had properly set up SBCL to automatically recompile stale fasls that I
> had done the same for clozure, which I just figured out I did not. My
The problem is not "stale" fasls in the normal sense of a fasl format
change. The problem is that the package structure of ASDF changed from
minor version to minor version, so fasls that reference one minor
version's packages might contain invalid package references if you
upgrade to a new minor version.
If you attempt a recompile on any error, rather than just the invalid
fasl error, you might be able to automatically get around this problem.
More information about the asdf-devel