[asdf-devel] [armedbear-devel] Patches for ABCL against asdf-1.641

[Faré]

Sorry, I haven't tried recompiling the latest ABCL from source and
don't know if any pathname issue remains.

Have you tried downloading the latest ASDF and running its test suite?
Do you pass all tests? I ought to include more tests about the
output-translations configuration and the source-registry
configuration...

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Majority, n.:
        That quality that distinguishes a crime from a law.




On 24 March 2010 04:14, Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote:
> On 3/23/10 4:53 PM, Faré wrote:
> […]
>
>> I hope ABCL has fixed its merge-pathnames woes.
>
> […]
>
> As I reported last week, ASDF2 works with ABCL from trunk and the upcoming
> abcl-0.19 release, for which I have fixed a couple issues with our pathname
> support.
>
> Are there current failures with ABCL's MERGE-PATHNAMES that you are
> referring to, or is this referring to the state of ABCL a couple weeks ago?
>  If there are known problems, please help me identify them so we can fix
> them or at least record the information in our issue tracker.
>
>
> --
> "A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before, but there
> is nothing to compare to it now."
>