[asdf-devel] ASDF traverse changed behavior?

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <
juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Before, if an operation defined by me, such as LIB-OP, did not traverse a
> system, then the only operation we got was that operation applied on the
> system, as a generic object.
>
> Now TRAVERSE not only imposes the LIB-OP operation on the system, but it
> also scans the components and imposes the operation on the components.
>

Instead of having TRAVERSE use  some kind of hard-coded logic as it does now

            (let ((module-ops
                   (when (typep c 'module)
[...]
                       (dolist (kid (module-components c))
                           (handler-case

why not go back to something more reasonable which is based on
COMPONENT-DEPENDS-ON

(defmethod component-depends-on ((o operation) (c system))
  ...)

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://tream.dreamhosters.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20100317/a9e9902b/attachment.html>