[asdf-devel] 1.636

[james anderson]

most everything now has equivalent results.[1]
abcl now loads asdf, but the test fails anomalously. looking...


abcl fails in connection with a make-pathname operation of the sort

    (make-pathname :directory '(:relative) :name
"file" :type :unspecific :host nil :device nil)

which i suspect is the first component relative pathname from the
first file component in the first system definition, and i've not
(yet) understood how handler-bind is intended to behave with abcl, so
that pretty much aborts the tests.

i also can't say much about the context, as the stack trace is opaque.

anyway...

abcl has a distinct dislike for :unspecific pathname components.

if the 1.636 code for merge-pathnames* is patched for abcl to always  
use #'ununspecific, abcl constructs all systems and succeeds with the  
same 1280/2080 directory/file matches as most of the other  
implementations.


---
   [1] : http://ec2-204-236-204-89.compute-1.amazonaws.com/test/
20100315T221624/

On 2010-03-15, at 22:53 , Faré wrote:

> I tagged ASDF 1.636.
> * Can some ABCL user try it? It doesn't have asdf-method-combination
> and magic asdf:around anymore.
> * James Anderson, can you re-test it, particularly with allegro?
> * Juanjo, does it satisfy you wrt output-files protocol?
>
> [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://
> fare.tunes.org ]
> The only way to have a friend is to be one. — Ralph Waldo Emerson
>
> _______________________________________________
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel


_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel