[asdf-devel] Question about defsystem
Robert Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.info
Mon Jun 7 02:18:30 UTC 2010
I was just looking over Scott's bugreports and I am wondering a bit
about a snippet in defsystem:
(defmacro defsystem (name &body options)
(destructuring-bind (&key (pathname nil pathname-arg-p) (class 'system)
defsystem-depends-on &allow-other-keys)
options
(let ((component-options (remove-keys '(:defsystem-depends-on
:class) options)))
`(progn
;; system must be registered before we parse the body, otherwise
;; we recur when trying to find an existing system of the same name
;; to reuse options (e.g. pathname) from
,@(loop :for system :in defsystem-depends-on
:collect `(load-system ,system))
(let ((s (system-registered-p ',name)))
*** (cond ((and s (eq (type-of (cdr s)) ',class))
(setf (car s) (get-universal-time)))
(s
(change-class (cdr s) ',class))
(t
(register-system (quote ,name)
(make-instance ',class :name ',name))))
(%set-system-source-file (load-pathname)
(cdr (system-registered-p ',name))))
(parse-component-form
nil (list*
:module (coerce-name ',name)
:pathname
,(determine-system-pathname pathname pathname-arg-p)
',component-options))))))
Look at the cond that's starred -- the first and third branches both
cause the DEFINED-SYSTEMS entry for NAME to be updated to the current
value of GET-UNIVERSAL-TIME. But the *second* branch does not seem to
(unless it happens by some complex chain as a side-effect of CHANGE-CLASS).
Can anyone explain why we shouldn't update the DEFINED-SYSTEMS entry in
the case where S already exists but of a different type? Or does this
happen as a side-effect of CHANGE-CLASS?
Perhaps this is worthy of a comment....
best,
r
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list