[asdf-devel] Performance hit in TRUENAMIZE

Faré fahree at gmail.com
Sat Jul 24 22:48:47 UTC 2010

Dear Juanjo,

thanks for your input and sorry for not looking at the details of your
patch earlier.

I don't see what probe-file does that's different from (ignore-errors
(truename ...)), but OK for the sake of performance I can see it being
done. Is CLISP the only one to error when probe-file'ing a directory?
Can/should we always test for the wildcardness of the pathname?

Can you test/review the following patch based on yours? I intend to
make it into ASDF 2.112.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you;
but if you really make them think, they'll hate you. — Don Marquis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2.112.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2995 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20100724/c8138ca0/attachment.bin>

More information about the asdf-devel mailing list