[asdf-devel] patch for component-relative-pathname

[Faré]

>> why is this better than to leave names atomic and provide a standard
>> syntax to parse component relative (sic) pathnames?
>
> Note that my whole last email is a red herring wrt this question.  My
> last email assumes that Fare's change stays in, and I'm trying to write
> it up in the documentation.
>
> I.e., "let's you and him fight."  I am bowing out of this discussion.
>
I don't understand the question and the proposed alternatives,
so I can't argue an answer.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
If you waste time explaining why a socialist's welfare plan will fail,
it didn't: it successfully diverted your attention from a Power Grab.