[asdf-devel] new asdf does not like matlisp.asd

[Mario S. Mommer]

Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info>
writes:
> On 4/11/10 Apr 11 -11:42 AM, Faré wrote:
>> 1- Would making unix-dso a subclass of component but not of module
>>    somehow help solve the problem?
>
> <blush>I didn't even carefully read the system definition --- I just dug
> in to trying to make it load.  You are right --- I don't see any reason
> why this should be a subclass of module instead of component.</blush>

Well, I think it is a module because it has components. In that small
example it has only one, but the in the full matlisp.asd there are a few
submodules to it.