[asdf-devel] Two questions
csr21 at cantab.net
Wed Sep 30 11:50:29 UTC 2009
Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/9/30 Nick Levine <ndl at ravenbrook.com>:
>> Maybe what you want is #+frob (:file "foo")
>> Ideally not, as you'd have to remember to reload all your .asd files
>> every time you messed with features.
>> If this isn't what :feature does, then what is it for?
> I had never heard of it before. Looks like it's broken by design.
Well, that's one possibility.
The reason that you don't want reader conditionals for
implementation-specific files in a system description is that
compilation and loading isn't the only thing that you do to a system.
Another thing that you might do, for example, is package up the system,
whether that is as a tarball or an operating-system package (e.g. a
.deb). To do that from within a Lisp, you need to be able to see all
the files, not just the ones that that particular lisp has *features*
for; that's what the asdf:feature dependency allows you to encode.
(This isn't just theoretical; the long-forgotten CCLANv1 that operated
as a bunch of .debs with common-lisp-controller support worked this way)
>> Hmm, that's an improvement. (Otoh writing about a rapidly moving
>> target is tricky. Each time I review this it's changed.)
As far as I know, the :around output-files method way of customizing the
output location of an asdf operation has worked for many, many years.
More information about the asdf-devel