[asdf-devel] XCVB patch for split-sequence

Samium Gromoff _deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
Fri Oct 23 08:13:55 UTC 2009


From: "Tobias C. Rittweiler" <tcr at freebits.de>
Subject: Re: [asdf-devel] XCVB patch for split-sequence
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:00:27 +0200

> Faré writes:
> 
>> > > --- old-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp    2009-10-22 20:10:35.110170150 -0400
>> > > +++ new-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp    2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 -0400
>> > > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
>> > >  ;;; * (split-sequence #\; ";oo;bar;ba;" :start 1 :end 9)
>> > >  ;;; -> ("oo" "bar" "b"), 9
>> > >
>> > > +#+xcvb (module ())
>> > > +
>> >
>> > This is... no.  Please find some way of not infesting code with
>> > build-related metainformation.
>> >
>> OK, I'll put this much-requested feature near the top of my TODO list.
> 
> If every .lisp file has to begin with such an expression, can't you
> simply introduce a file-as-module defaulting scope?

Where would the inter-file dependencies go, then?

Let's suppose you implied that the module form would be specified if only
there actually are any dependencies to speak of. 

This implies that you have to use heuristics while interpreting the
first form -- is it in the (module (&key &allow-other-keys)) form or not.

Is this acceptable to Faré?


regards,
  Samium Gromoff
--
                                 _deepfire-at-feelingofgreen.ru
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org


More information about the asdf-devel mailing list