[asdf-devel] Two questions
Gary King
gwking at metabang.com
Fri Oct 2 00:52:53 UTC 2009
Hi Robert,
On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Gary King wrote:
>
>>
>> The output-files technique is the most flexible. However, as Faré
>> said, ASDF now includes some measure of customization out of the box
>> (1.365). See http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/getting-started.html#header2-27
>> and http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/manual.html#binary-locations
>
> I am looking at asdf.texinfo and I see no discussion of binary
> locations. What's going on here?
Well, ... that's a long story <smile>.
Perhaps rashly, I moved ASDF's documentation into CL-Markdown without
discussion quite a few months ago and have incorporated your patches,
etc. there.
The current live docs are in website/source.
I understand your concerns about the move but I also know that
maintaining the docs as they are now is a lot easier for me...
For now, I'd like to keep the docs in CL-Markdown and think about
moving them back into TexInfo when time permits.
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list