[armedbear] #443: ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME effectively ignores TIME-ZONE argument
armedbear
armedbear-devel at common-lisp.net
Sun Apr 9 10:22:06 UTC 2017
#443: ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME effectively ignores TIME-ZONE argument
------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: mevenson | Owner: mevenson
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 1.5.0
Component: interpreter | Version: 1.5.0-dev
Resolution: | Keywords:
Parent Tickets: |
------------------------------+-----------------------
Description changed by mevenson:
Old description:
> In <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-
> devel/2017-March/003807.html>
>
> {{{
> A contributor to the Maxima project bumped into this while trying
> Maxima + ABCL 1.4.0.
>
> CL-USER(1): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 -23)
> 3017516508
> CL-USER(2): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 -13)
> 3017516508
> CL-USER(3): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 13)
> 3017516508
> CL-USER(4): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 23)
> 3017516508
> CL-USER(5): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 'foo)
> 3017516508
>
> Not too surprising, I think -- a glance at
> ./src/org/armedbear/lisp/time.lisp shows that the TIME-ZONE argument
> doesn't take part in the calculations.
>
> TIME-ZONE does come into play in pre-r14840 versions of time.lisp and
> the
> results are consistent with other CL implementations, at least for the
> examples exercised by the Maxima test suite (date parsing).
> }}}
New description:
In <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-
devel/2017-March/003807.html>.
Breaks with r14840.
{{{
A contributor to the Maxima project bumped into this while trying
Maxima + ABCL 1.4.0.
CL-USER(1): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 -23)
3017516508
CL-USER(2): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 -13)
3017516508
CL-USER(3): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 13)
3017516508
CL-USER(4): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 23)
3017516508
CL-USER(5): (ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME 48 1 15 15 8 1995 'foo)
3017516508
Not too surprising, I think -- a glance at
./src/org/armedbear/lisp/time.lisp shows that the TIME-ZONE argument
doesn't take part in the calculations.
TIME-ZONE does come into play in pre-14840 versions of time.lisp and the
results are consistent with other CL implementations, at least for the
examples exercised by the Maxima test suite (date parsing).
}}}
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://abcl.org/trac/ticket/443#comment:3>
armedbear <http://abcl.org>
armedbear
More information about the armedbear-ticket
mailing list