[armedbear-ticket] [armedbear] #32: Modify the currently disabled runtime-class.lisp code to not require ASM
armedbear
armedbear-devel at common-lisp.net
Mon Mar 15 19:41:02 UTC 2010
#32: Modify the currently disabled runtime-class.lisp code to not require ASM
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: vvoutilainen | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: too-vague
Component: other | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: jvm bytecode compiler runtime dynamic class generation
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by ehuelsmann):
* milestone: => too-vague
Old description:
> It's possible to define classes at runtime, by generating bytecode and
> loading it from the generated binary data, without ever writing it to a
> temporary file. runtime-class.lisp does that, but it requires an external
> bytecode library (ASM). ABCL has all the functionality for this to be
> done without ASM, so the task is to modify the runtime-class.lisp code so
> that ASM is no longer required and the code can be taken to be part of
> the build.
New description:
It's possible to define classes at runtime, by generating bytecode and
loading it from the generated binary data, without ever writing it to a
temporary file. runtime-class.lisp does that, but it requires an external
bytecode library (ASM). ABCL has all the functionality for this to be done
without ASM, so the task is to modify the runtime-class.lisp code so that
ASM is no longer required and the code can be taken to be part of the
build.
--
Comment:
We currently not-write to temporary files for any COMPILEd functions (ie
this does not apply to COMPILE-FILE compiled functions - yet). So, the
real requirement here is too vague.
Do we need this for other purposes?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/32#comment:1>
armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear>
armedbear
More information about the armedbear-ticket
mailing list