[armedbear-ticket] [armedbear] #23: RETURN handled differently in interpreted and compiled code
armedbear
armedbear-devel at common-lisp.net
Wed Nov 5 21:25:40 UTC 2008
#23: RETURN handled differently in interpreted and compiled code
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: somebody
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: component1 | Version:
Keywords: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Robert Dodier writes:
See below for foobar.lisp.
Interpreted:
(foobar)
=>
HELLO 1
NIL
Compiled:
(foobar)
=>
HELLO 1
HELLO 2
T
I'm no expert on the CL spec so I don't know which is correct.
But I think Maxima expects the behavior shown by interpreted code here.
Thanks for your attention to this.
Robert Dodier
PS.
$ cat foobar.lisp
(defun blurf () nil)
(defun foobar ()
(prog (x y z)
(declare (ignore x y z))
((lambda (a b)
(declare (ignore a b))
(format t "HELLO 1~%")
(cond ((not (blurf)) (return nil))))
nil nil)
(format t "HELLO 2~%")
(return t)))
--
Ticket URL: <http://127.0.0.1:8000/armedbear/ticket/23>
armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear>
armedbear
More information about the armedbear-ticket
mailing list