<div dir="ltr">Hi Anton,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for running the tests! Bummer that the change causes regressions and no improvements. It's completely against my expectations, but with that data in hand, I should be able to figure out what went wrong.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Erik.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Anton Vodonosov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avodonosov@yandex.ru" target="_blank">avodonosov@yandex.ru</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
Diff between ABCL 1.3.1 and the current dev version (svn revision 14755):<br>
<a href="https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff25.html" target="_blank">https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff25.html</a><br>
<br>
Unfortunately there are only regressions.<br>
<br>
(The green results for cffi-libffi are due to installed libffi-dev on the testing machine,<br>
not because of ABCL improvement)<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
- Anton<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Bye,<div><br></div><div>Erik.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://efficito.com/" target="_blank">http://efficito.com</a> -- Hosted accounting and ERP.</div><div>Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.</div></div></div>
</div>