[Armedbear-devel] Non-zero timeouts CL:SLEEP and THREADS:OBJECT-WAIT below the timer Planck limit interpolated as a nanosecond
James M. Lawrence
llmjjmll at gmail.com
Sat Apr 19 16:44:47 UTC 2014
Hi, lparallel tests now pass with the timeout change in this pull request
One thing that puzzles me -- I checked old versions of ABCL back to
1.0.0, and none gave an indefinite wait for (sleep 0). Do you remember
why you changed (sleep 0) to (sleep 0.01) in thread-yield in February
2011? I changed it back to (sleep 0) in the pull request, but I didn't
realize I was undoing your change until this moment.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2014, at 19:41, James M. Lawrence <llmjjmll at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote:
>>> I propose to interpolate non-zero values specified by the user of less than a nanosecond to CL:SLEEP/THREADS:OBJECT-WAIT to mean a sleep/wait for a nanosecond. If the user specifies a zero-value, then she will get an infinite timeout.
> Please check that the [referenced commit] to appear in the soon-to-be released abcl-1.3.1 addresses your needs.
> : http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14679
> "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is nothing
> to compare to it now."
Armedbear-devel mailing list
Armedbear-devel at common-lisp.net
More information about the armedbear-devel