[Armedbear-devel] Non-zero timeouts CL:SLEEP and THREADS:OBJECT-WAIT below the timer Planck limit interpolated as a nanosecond
ehuels at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 13:19:15 UTC 2014
Are you sure? According to this article:
there's no stable Yield implementation across platforms on Java. Do we
really want to provide platform defined behaviour?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2014, at 19:53, James M. Lawrence <llmjjmll at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What should bt:thread-yield do? (sleep 0) or (sleep 0.01) or (sleep
> > least-positive-single-float) or something else?
> ABCL should implement a THREADS:YIELD primitive mapping directly to
> In the intermin, impelement bt:thread-yield as
> (java:jcall "yield" (java:jstatic "currentThread"
> "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is
> to compare to it now."
> Armedbear-devel mailing list
> Armedbear-devel at common-lisp.net
http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the armedbear-devel