[armedbear-devel] Re: cl-test-grid: Testing ABCL-1.2.0-RC

[Mark Evenson]

Agreed: fixing STD-FIND-METHOD-COMBINATION seems to be necessary.

@anton: thanks for the tests 

@rudi: dunno if this is you, but could you take a look to see if this is easy? If you fix on trunk, I will  take care of the release.

At this point, I would release abcl-1.2.1 and announce, as abcl-1.2.0 has already been "softly launched" without announcement.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad idea?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in email?

On Jun 9, 2013, at 1:15, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:

> 08.06.2013, 02:35, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
>> 08.06.2013, 02:13, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
>> 
>>>  Hi Anton,
>>>  Could you test ABCL-1.2.0-RC with the latest Quicklisp snapshot and publish reports? I'd love to see how we're doing in the CL ecosystem before we release!
>>> 
>>>  Thanks!
>>> 
>>>  Bye,
>>> 
>>>  Erik.
>> 
>> Hello, Erik.
>> 
>> Just today I started the tests, on the 1.2.0 source tarball from abcl.org and on the current svn head.
>> They are running on your VM. The results will be a day or two later.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> - Anton
> 
> Hello again.
> 
> The results for ABCL 1.2.0 RC (the soruce tarball form abcl.org) are ready.
> Comparision with ABCL 1.1.1:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff10.html
> 
> As you see there are some regressions - results that were green and have become red.
> Most of the seem to be caused by the same error:  Wrong number of arguments for #<STD-FIND-METHOD-COMBINATION {17D2F0E}>.
> 
> Best regards,
> - Anton