[armedbear-devel] Bug: COND clauses must have a test

Mark Evenson evenson at panix.com
Thu Dec 5 22:20:15 UTC 2013

On Nov 24, 2013, at 15:03, Pascal J. Bourguignon <pjb at informatimago.com> wrote:

> The syntax for COND is:
> cond {clause}* => result*
> clause::= (test-form form*) 
> therefore (cond ()) should be a program-error, but abcl 1.0.1 returns
> NIL.

Erik addressed this in [r14588][].

[r14588]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14588

"A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before but there is nothing 
to compare to it now."

More information about the armedbear-devel mailing list