[armedbear-devel] Bug: COND clauses must have a test

[Mark Evenson]

On Nov 24, 2013, at 15:03, Pascal J. Bourguignon <pjb at informatimago.com> wrote:

> 
> The syntax for COND is:
> 
> cond {clause}* => result*
> clause::= (test-form form*) 
> 
> therefore (cond ()) should be a program-error, but abcl 1.0.1 returns
> NIL.

Erik addressed this in [r14588][].


[r14588]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14588

-- 
"A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before but there is nothing 
to compare to it now."