[armedbear-devel] Fwd: Re: [armedbear-cvs] r14218 - trunk/abcl/src/org/armedbear/lisp

[Erik Huelsmann]

sent from my phone
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>
Date: Oct 27, 2012 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [armedbear-cvs] r14218 - trunk/abcl/src/org/armedbear/lisp
To: <mevenson at common-lisp.net>
Cc: <Armedbear-devel at lists.sf.net>

Hi mark,

If the intended type is right, this should not be required, right? Then my
question is: why isn't the intended type correct?

Bye,

Erik.

sent from my phone
On Oct 27, 2012 10:50 AM, <mevenson at common-lisp.net> wrote:

> Author: mevenson
> Date: Sat Oct 27 01:50:30 2012
> New Revision: 14218
>
> Log:
> Always bypass method access checks for JSTATIC.
>
> Enables a (to be released) patched CFFI to actually use callbacks.
>
> Modified:
>    trunk/abcl/src/org/armedbear/lisp/Java.java
>
> Modified: trunk/abcl/src/org/armedbear/lisp/Java.java
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/abcl/src/org/armedbear/lisp/Java.java Fri Oct 26 23:40:54 2012
>      (r14217)
> +++ trunk/abcl/src/org/armedbear/lisp/Java.java Sat Oct 27 01:50:30 2012
>      (r14218)
> @@ -472,6 +472,7 @@
>                  else
>                      methodArgs[i-2] = arg.javaInstance(argTypes[i-2]);
>              }
> +            m.setAccessible(true);
>              Object result = m.invoke(null, methodArgs);
>             return JavaObject.getInstance(result, translate,
> m.getReturnType());
>          }
>
> _______________________________________________
> armedbear-cvs mailing list
> armedbear-cvs at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-cvs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-devel/attachments/20121027/eb6e67f6/attachment.html>